![[Flag of the United Kingdom]](../images/g/gb.gif)
1:2 | 
image by Clay Moss, 16 December 2006Flag adopted 1 January 1801.
Last modified: 2019-10-23 by rob raeside
Keywords: united kingdom | union jack | kings colours | great union |
Links: FOTW homepage |
search |
disclaimer and copyright |
write us |
mirrors
1:2 |
image by Clay Moss, 16 December 2006
Flag adopted 1 January 1801.
See also:
![[1707 union jack]](../images/g/gb_1707u.gif)
image by Željko Heimer, 24
January 2018
When King James VI of Scotland ascended to the English throne, thereby becoming James I of England, the national flags of England and Scotland on land continued to be, respectively, the red St George's cross and the white St Andrew's cross. Confusion arose, however, as to what flag would be appropriate at sea. On 12 April 1606 a proclamation was issued:
"All our subjects in this our isle and kingdom of Great Britain and the members thereof, shall bear in their main top the red cross commonly called St George's Cross and the white cross commonly called St. Andrew's Cross joined together according to a form made by our heralds and sent to our Admiral to be published to our said subjects."This is the first known reference to the Union Flag. Although the original design referred to has been lost, it is presumed that it was the flag which, with the addition of the St Patrick's cross, forms the basic design of the British Union Flag today. It is also interesting to note that the new flag was not universally popular nor accepted. The English were not overly pleased at the obscuring of the white field of the St George's flag. The Scots, with more justification, were upset at the fact that the red cross was laid over the white. The Scots proposed a number of alternative designs. These included:
None of these are very convincing designs and none were ever used. The Scots did, however, use an ingenious design in which the white cross of the St Andrew's flag was brought forward to overlay the red cross. This flag even seems to have achieved some limited official sanction. When the king visited Dumfries in 1618 he was hailed as the king under whose banner "the whyte and reid croces are so proportionablie interlaced." The word interlaced is held to be significant as it implies the use of the 'Scottish' version of the Union Flag:
![[A Scottish proposal]](../images/g/gb-altsc.gif)
image
by Stuart A. Notholt, 4 May 1996
As late as 1693, Slezer, Captain of Artillery and Surveyor-General of Stores
and Magazines in Scotland, produced an engraving on Edinburgh Castle in which
the 'Scottish' version is shown: again, an implication of actual use. Source:
Paul Harris (ed.), Story of Scotland's Flag, Lang Syne Publishers Ltd,
1992. Available from the Flag Research Center.
Stuart A. Notholt, 4 May 1996
The design of the Union Flag that preceded the current version
was established by a royal proclamation of 12 April 1606. However
it was for use only at sea in civil and military ships of both
Scotland and England. In 1634 its use was restricted to the king's
ships. The flag went out of use in 1649 when England became a
commonwealth but was restored for use in
the king's ships after the restoration in 1660. The flag became 'the
ensign armorial of the United Kingdom of Great Britain' as one of the
provisions of the Act of Union in 1707, when the kingdoms of England
and Scotland were united.
David Prothero, 2 July 1998
![[A Scottish proposal]](../images/g/gb-altsc2.gif)
image
by Tomislav Todorovic, 16 May 2013
According to Hulme, "The Flags of the World" (1896), p. 46:
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Flags_of_the_World there was another
proposal, with white Scottish saltire, fimbriated blue, placed over the red
English cross on white field. In Hulme's opinion, this variant was probably
rejected because "here we get false heraldry, the blue in contact with the
red, and in any case a rather weak-looking arrangement".
Image source:
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Flags_of_the_World/Plate_9
Note that
the legend for this illustration is erroneous: "Scotch suggestion for Union
Flag, 1801.", as is the legend for the variant which was used: "Suggested
Form[s] for second Union Jack."
Tomislav Todorovic, 16 May 2013
![[A Scottish proposal]](../images/g/gb-altsc3.gif)
image
by Tomislav Todorovic, 21 August 2013
Another variant seems to have been in use, with the Scottish saltire in
blue superimposed over the red English cross on white field. It is shown on a
ceiling boss from Linlithgow Palace, currently exhibited in the National Museum
of Scotland, which depicts the Scottish royal unicorn (heavily damaged - the
head no longer exists) holding a flag with this design. The original paints of
the flag have been rather paled by age, and even seem to have been peeled off in
some places, but are still recognizable, and seem to reveal that there was no
white fimbriation between blue and red. The boss is dated c. 1617, not long
after the original Union Jack was adopted, and clearly suggests that the
Scottish variants of the flag, this one at least, might have had some official
use, since this depiction of it comes from a royal palace.
Sources:
[1] Wikipedia page about the Union Jack:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_jack#Other_proposed_versions
[2]
Large photo of the Linlithgow Palace ceiling boss at Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Linlithgow_Palace_unicorn_boss,_c.1617.JPG
Tomislav Todorovic, 21 August 2013
This one-off example shows it to have been unique and indicates the chance of
the artist's ignorance.
Christopher Southworth, 21 August 2014
That may have been the case. On the other hand, there is the variant given by
Hulme which has
some resemblance to this one. Unfortunately, we currently don't know Hulme's
sources. And I think that we should not forget similar flags from the
cartoons by James Gillray although these display
English cross over the Scottish saltire and at least some of them are
certainly erroneous. All of these varying designs, which still strikingly
resemble each other, probably did not just come out of nowhere.
Tomislav Todorovic,
22 August 2014
![[A Scottish proposal]](../images/g/gb-altsc3.jpg)
image located by Peter Hans van den Muijzenberg, 23 August 2014
Here is the relevant part of the
Wikipedia image. I'm not sure what to say. It looks like the orthogonal
cross has been removed completely, be it by time or human hand. Where the shape
left behind shows most clearly, it does looks like there is some sort of
fimbriation to the blue.
Peter Hans van den Muijzenberg, 23 August
2014
Although the red color is indeed less preserved than blue, there still seems
be left some. And the parts which might look like a white fimbriation, also look
like the result of damage, and in the other parts, blue and red are contiguous.
I forgot to add that the flag is actually a painted bas-relief, the areas in
different colors also having different elevations, which helps in recognizing
the orthogonal cross even there where is very little color left, if any.
Tomislav Todorovic, 23 August 2014
I would see there's no red left at all. What we see is the building material
(dark), an undercoat (pale) or two, and the blue and white paints. The shadows
along the edges show what is deeper and what is higher. I find it a bit suspect
that the red disappeared so completely. Either it was of poor quality, or its
disappearance was assisted.
Peter Hans van den Muijzenberg, 23
August 2014
Maybe some reddish wood was intentionally chosen? Either is possible,
although I'd still opt for the first variant - after all, Scottish symbol was
placed over the English one, which might be enough to make a number of potential
removers give up. Also note that the hoist arm of red(dish) cross is not
completely separated from blue saltire by what resembles a white fimbriation -
there is a small part where two areas are contiguous.
Tomislav Todorovic,
23 August 2014
"Scottish symbols" by William McMillan (Paisley: Alexander Gardner, n.d. but
approx. 1915), p.219, in discussing the provision of the Treaty of Union that
the crosses of St. Andrew and St. George should be combined in all British
flags,
objects to the much greater prominence given to the St. George's
Cross in the White Ensign, and proposes an alternative. The author says: "In it
the field would be divided between the white fields of St. George and St.
Patrick and the
blue field of St. Andrew. The four bars [presumably
horizontal although he goes not specify this] would also represent the four
separate kingdoms [sic] which make up Britain". He must have been counting wales
as a Kingdom, which
would not be the official view, either then or now. I do
not suppose that any attention was paid to this suggestion, although at the same
period there were complaints that some English Regiments were permitted to use
the St. George's
Cross as the basis of their colours, whereas Scottish
Regiments could not use the St. Andrew's Cross.
Kenneth Fraser, 12
November 2015
![[Union flag proposal, 1604]](../images/g/gb_1604a.gif) |
![[Union flag proposal, 1604]](../images/g/gb_1604b.gif)
by Ivan Sache |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The June edition of "BBC History" magazine has a short piece marking the four hundredth anniversary of the Union of the Crowns in 1603 when James VI of Scotland became James I of England. This included a photograph of a series of designs for a Union Flag, here redrawn by Ivan Sache. The caption to the article said: "Cross countries: designs for a Union flag, kept in the National Library of Scotland, c 1604 by an unknown artist; the Note of Preference is signed by the Earl of Nottingham" [this note was attached to the fifth design, per pale Cross of St. George, Cross of St. Andrew.]
André Coutanche, 25 May 2003
As a matter of interest, the 'impaled' design was actually used (from c1643) as a jack by Royalist ships in the English Civil War. Another design not shown had a quarterly arrangement - Cross of St George first and fourth, Cross of St Andrew second and third - and this is known to have been used as a jack on at least one occasion (1623).
Christopher Southworth, 25 May 2003
![[Union flag of 1606]](../images/g/gb_1800c.jpg)
by David Prothero
A drawing of the Union Flag that was sent to the Office of Stores for the
Navy Board, on 15 November 1800 was marked, 'Union Flag from 1st January 1801
(c)', but the fimbriation had been made by reducing the width of the red
diagonal. The drawing, as reproduced in the Mariner's Mirror (Journal of the
Society for Nautical Research), is shown here.
It was found among a collection of drawings and letters from the office that
organised flags for the Navy. The collection of correspondence was closed in
1837 and apparently retained in the Secretary of the Admiralty's Office until
1949, when it was handed to the Admiralty Library. It is unlikely that it was
ever seen by
William G. Perrin. Commander Hilary P. Mead R.N. described it in two articles in
the
Mariner's Mirror, April 1951 and February 1952.
He commented that the drawing, "differed somewhat from that in Perrin's plate
IV." I wonder if the change was made by accident or design?
"Admiralty Office, 15 November 1800.
Gentlemen,
A Report from the Lords of the Committee of the whole Council, dated 4th instant
etc., etc. [details of decision to issue a Royal Proclamation]
That the Committee were further of opinion that the Union Flag should be altered according to the Draught thereof marked (C) in which the Cross of St George is conjoined with the Crosses of St Andrew and St Patrick:
And that the Standard be the Arms of the United Kingdom according to the Draught
marked (B);
And that on and after the First Day of January next ensuing the said Flags and
Banners should be hoisted and displayed on all His Majesty's Forts and Castles
within the United Kingdom, and the Islands of Guernsey, Jersey, Alderney, Sark,
and Man, and also on board all His Majesty's Ships of War, then lying in any of
the Ports or Harbours of the said United Kingdom, or of the Islands aforesaid,
and on board His Majesty's Ships employed on Foreign Service, as soon after the
said First Day of January next as His Majesty's Proclamation or Order in Council
shall be received by the Commanders of His Majesty's Ships employed on Foreign
Service; We herewith transmit to you a Printed Copy of His Majesty's Order in
Council of the 5th instant approving the Report of the Lords of the Committee
afore-mentioned, and do hereby desire and direct you to cause such Flags and
Standards as may be necessary to be prepared conformably to the said Draughts
for the use of His Majesty's Ships of War at Home and on Foreign Stations, and
to be supplied with them accordingly, with all the dispatch that may be.
You are also to cause the Colours described in the said Order in Council to be
hoisted in all the Dock Yards of the Kingdom upon the 1st Day of January next,
and to supply the necessary Colours for the use of the Naval Hospitals at Home,
and the Naval Yards and Hospitals abroad, in the manner directed by the said
Order in Council;
We are Your affectionate Friends,
Arden, J.Gambier, W.Young. Navy Board."
Note by John David Rolt, chief clerk in the Office for Stores, the Navy Board.
Memorandum ( to C ). "The Ensign is Red, White and Blue according to the Colours
of the Admiral's Flag, who bears it, with this Union Jack in a Canton in the
Upper or Chief Dexter corner, and next the staff." Mead notes; "The Union Flag
is from 24 to 18 breadths and is allowed to Flag Ships only. The Jack is the
same in all respects except in sizes, which are from 10 breadths downwards.
David Prothero, 2 February 2003
The Admiralty version of the Union Flag, shown above, is, in fact, a
corruption of the herald's original intention. In the Admiralty version (still
of course in use today) fimbriation to the saltire of St Patrick is created by
taking it from the saltire itself instead of from the field, whereas, according
to the original design the saltires of St Andrew and St Patrick should be of
equal width with a fimbriation added. The colour illustration (preserved in the
Privy Council papers) and blazon supplied by Sir Isaac Heard (Garter
King-at-Arms) was - in accordance with Article One of the Act of Union between
Great Britain and Ireland - approved by the King in an Order in Council of 5
November 1800. The Act of Union was then proclaimed in London Gazette No. 15324
dated 1 January 1801, with the blazon (accompanied by a monochrome drawing)
reading as follows: "...that the Union Flag shall be azure, the Crosses Saltires
of St Andrew and St Patrick Quarterly per Saltire, counterchanged Argent and
Gules; the latter fimbriated of the Second surmounted by the Cross of St George
of the Third, fimbriated as the Saltire".
Which brings me to the Great Union of 1900. In preparing a design for the War
Office the College of Heralds returned to the original blazon and correctly made
the saltires of even width with a fimbriation added, however, whilst it is
obvious from the 18th Century illustration that the phrase "fimbriated as the
saltire" was intended to mean 'fimbriated in the same colour as the saltire',
the late-Victorian heralds wrongly interpreted this as meaning of 'the same
*width and* colour'.
Christopher Southworth, 28 May 2006
I checked some documents that might have had information about the
introduction of the new Union Jack in 1801.
The Captains Logs from ten RN ships in commission on 1 January 1801, selected at
random, produced three references to the occasion. Blanche in Portsmouth
"hoisted the (something, possibly 'union') colour", Phoebe in Cork "fired salute
of 21 guns to celebrate union between Great Britain and Ireland" and Agincourt
at Spithead did the same, though a day later on 2nd of January.
The notice that announced the Red Ensign was headed;
"Caution to Masters of Merchant Vessels Against Wearing Unlawful Colours. By the
King a Proclamation, First Day of January 1801."
It included a small drawing of the Red Ensign in black and white with the
colours indicated by words. The width of the diagonal stripes was in proportions
1-2-3, arranged with the wider white stripe uppermost not only in the first and
third quarters, but also in the second and fourth quarters.
David Prothero, 6 February 2003
The introduction of the present Union Jack appears to have been more
complicated than the usual accounts suggest. It obviously depended upon the
Union actually taking place, and this required the assent of both British and
Irish parliaments, but in December 1799 the Bill was rejected by the Irish
parliament. It was re-introduced in the New Year and finally passed its Third
Reading on 7 June 1800. I do not know if the corresponding Bill had already been
passed by the British parliament, or whether it was done shortly afterwards. It
received the Royal Assent on 2 July 1800, (40 Geo. III c. 67).
The article in the Act relating to the flag stated; "That it be the first
Article of the Union of the Kingdoms of Great Britain and Ireland, .... that the
ensigns, armorial flags and banners thereof shall be such as His Majesty, by his
royal Proclamation under the Great Seal of the United Kingdom, shall be pleased
to appoint."
However it appears that the flag had already been designed, and some examples
made. On the following day, 3 July, the Duke of Portland, Home Secretary, wrote
to Viscount Castlereagh, Chief Irish Secretary ending, "... and, as to the new
Union Flag, that, though ready, was not hoisted, because we found out that we
have no right to use it until the first of next year, when the Union takes
place."
http://www.actofunion.ac.uk/castlereaghindex.php?volume=3 Documents 352/353.
Perhaps it had been intended that the Union should take place on the first day
of the new century ? The Order in Council of 5th November 1800 seems to have
been a formality.
Whether the Union Jack is an "official national flag" depends upon ones
interpretation of the phrase. It is the official royal flag of a monarchy, and
thus the kingdom's national flag, but its use by private individuals or bodies
has been sanctioned by parliamentary statements, not by legislation.
22 October 1902. Mr Balfour, First Lord of the Treasury. The
questions which have been raised as to the proper use of flags have received
careful consideration by the Government, but they are unable to adopt the course
of action suggested. Nor does it appear desirable to undertake the legislation
that would be necessary in order to regulate the general use by civilians, or
any class of civilians, of any particular flag on land. It is a matter which is
best left, as hitherto, to the guidance of custom and good taste.
[By way of further explanation, the First Lord of the Treasury is one of the
other offices of the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom - and in fact is
written on his letterbox at his office at 10 Downing Street, London. This would
indicate the high level at which this matter was being deliberated at that time.
Source: Web site of the British Prime Minister,
http://www.10downingstreet.gov.uk,
consulted 12 June 2006.
Colin Dobson, 12 June 2006]
9 May 1912. Colonel M'Calmont. To ask Prime Minister whether
the Union Jack is the emblem of the nation rather than the sovereign, and if
this is so, in the event of the Government of Ireland Bill becoming law, will it
be competent for the Irish Parliament to eliminate the cross of St Patrick from
the national flag. Mr. Asquith. The Union Jack was established by Royal
Proclamation under the Act of Union and is as much a matter of prerogative as
the Royal Standard.
David Prothero, 13 June 2005
![[Union flag of 1606]](../images/g/gb_1800c.gif)
image by Željko Heimer, 28 September 2019
Image based on the reproduction of Draft C published in “Perrin” plate IV.
Chris Southworth, 22 September 2019
I can confirm that I drew the 1801 Union Jack from Perrin some time ago
(around 2015) on the request and from sources provided by Chris. The source
drawing had unusually different widths of the St. George's cross arms, and I
tried to follow it "to the letter" (or to the line, in this case).
I
can't find the source drawing Chris sent me, but according to my measurements of
it, I prepared a flag in a rectangle of 60×90 units, the horizontal red arm 12
units, fimbriated white 4 units, the vertical red arm 9 units, fimbriated 3
units. Width of half St. Andrews' and St. Patrick's crosses along the hoist,
6.667 units - note that both are of the same width, white the white fimbriation
around St. Patrics' enters "into the blue", as opposed to the modern flags,
width of fimbriation along hoist 1.111 units.
Obviously, it is a pretty
unique way of drawing the UJ, but it must have been the norm in the early days.
When the current design became usual, it is beyond my expertise.
Željko
Heimer, 28 September 2019
What is the correct Flag to be flown on land by Civilians?
This answer was based upon a Minute by Garter, King of Arms:
"There is no Flag in existence answering to this general description. Civilians
generally are not authorised to fly or display any Flag. Peers and
gentlemen entitled to bear Arms have a right to fly from their Castles or
residences a banner of their Arms. The Royal Standard appertains to the
Sovereign alone. The Union Flag of the United Kingdom is used by authority
throughout the Army and Navy, and the State Departments, usually with some
modification or addition by way of distinction. The Union Flag, being the
National Flag, appertains to the Nation as a whole, and cannot be considered as
specially distinctive of individuals, or groups of individuals. The common
practice on occasions of national rejoicing of displaying the Royal Standard and
the Union Flag indiscriminately with other Flags must be regarded as an attempt
to express loyalty by means of decoration. As to Public Buildings, Schools, etc
- State Buildings should fly the Union Flag. Schools etc., should fly the Flag
displaying their proper Arms. Municipal Buildings should fly a banner of the
Arms of the particular Corporate body. The issue of a Royal Warrant touching
this matter would, in my opinion, be inexpedient.
Sir Arthur W. Woods."
David Prothero, 12 June 2006
A 1902 Home Office Minute on the question:
There appears to be no such thing as a "correct" flag for use by civilians on
land. It seems that any one who has a coat of arms may display them on a flag,
and the Union Flag has been used without restraint. A warrant under the Act of
Union can be and has been issued fixing the ensigns, ceremonial flags and
banners of the United Kingdom, but this warrant does not relate to such flags as
private people may fly. The Union flag has been used indiscriminately for a very
long period. There is no power by law to interfere with the use on land of any
flag even the King's Standard. Any such warrant as proposed would therefore be
accompanied by no means of enforcing it. There seems no reason why the state
should intervene as to flying flags on land, (except as regards the King's
Standard). To attempt to enforce any rule would bring the state into conflict
with Trades Unions, the Royal Order of Ancient Buffaloes, the Foresters, and for
all we know the processions of the Roman Catholics and Ritualists (etc). In fact
it is impossible to say where it would end. To lay it down that all schools
should use, say the Union Jack, would at once provoke a number of schools in
Ireland to display a green flag with a harp, or a sunburst, the Socialists to
display red banners. Is the state then to interfere and compel them all to use
the Union Jack only ? Such an attempt would I think raise a veritable hornet's
nest. The true answer is I think, that "there is no 'correct flag' for use on
land except the Royal Standard by the King, and possibly coats of arms by those
who possess them. There is no power at law to enforce the use of any flag. The
use of flags on land has been regulated only by custom and good taste."
David Prothero, 12 June 2006
![[Union flag proposal, 1604]](../images/g/gb_1604c.gif)
![[Union flag proposal, 1604]](../images/g/gb_1604d.gif)
![[Union flag proposal, 1604]](../images/g/gb_1604e.gif)
![[Union flag proposal, 1604]](../images/g/gb_1604f.gif)
